Democracy
always favors dialogue over confrontation. So,
too, in Pakistan, where the terrorists who
threaten both our country and the United States
have gained the most from the recent verbal
assaults some in America have made against
Pakistan. This strategy is damaging the
relationship between Pakistan and the United
States and compromising common goals in
defeating terrorism, extremism and fanaticism.
It is time for the rhetoric to cool and for
serious dialogue between allies to resume.
Pakistan sits on many critical fault lines.
Terrorism is not a statistic for us. Our
geopolitical location forces us to look to a
future where the great global wars will be
fought on the battleground of ideas. From the
Middle East to South Asia, a hurricane of change
is transforming closed societies into
marketplaces of competing narratives. The
contest between the incendiary politics of
extremism and the slow burn of modern democracy
is already being fought in every village filled
with cellphones, in every schoolroom, on every
television talk show. It is a battle that
moderation must win.
Our motives are simple. We have a huge
population of young people who have few choices
in life. Our task is to turn this demographic
challenge into a dividend for democracy and
pluralism, where the embrace of tolerance elbows
out the lure of extremism, where jobs turn
desolation into opportunity and empowerment,
where plowshares take the place of guns, where
women and minorities have a meaningful place in
society.
None of this vision for a new Pakistan is
premised on the politics of victimhood. It
pivots on a worldview where we fight the war
against extremism and terrorism as our battle,
at every precinct and until the last person,
even though we lack the resources to match our
commitment. When Pakistan seeks support, we look
for trade that will make us sustainable, not aid
that will bind us in transactional ties. When we
commit to a partnership against terrorism, we do
it in the hope that our joint goals will be
addressed. When we add our shoulder to the
battle, we look for outcomes that leave us
stronger.
Yet as Pakistan is pounded by the ravages of
globally driven climate change, with floods once
again making millions of our citizens homeless,
we find that, instead of a dialogue with our
closest strategic ally, we are spoken to instead
of being heard. We are being battered by nature
and by our friends. This has shocked a nation
that is bearing the brunt of the terrorist
whirlwind in the region. And why?
After the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the world’s
most powerful democracy compromised its
fundamental values to accommodate a dictator in
Pakistan. Since then we have lost 30,000
innocent civilians and 5,000 military and police
officers to the militant mind-set that the U.S.
government is now charging that we support. We
have suffered more than 300 suicide bomb attacks
by the forces that allegedly find sanctuary
within our borders. We have hemorrhaged
approximately $100 billion directly in the war
effort and tens of billions more in lost foreign
investment. The war is being fought in
Afghanistan and in Pakistan, yet Washington has
invested almost nothing on our side of the
border and hundreds of billions of dollars on
the other side.