|
TI rates military regime as more corrupt
than political governments

NAB is political
tool of regime rather than for ending corruption
Islamabad September 20, 2006: A PPP spokesperson has drawn attention to the
report by Transparency International which has claimed that the present military
regime is perceived as more corrupt than its democratic or civilian
predecessors.
The corruption watchdog's 2006 report on Pakistan is based on a sample of 4,000
urban and semi-urban citizens in all four provinces. Asked about the present
government, 33 percent of the respondents thought that it was corrupt in
1999-2002, but when asked to assess the period 2002-06, more than 67 percent
thought it was corrupt. Yes, it is true 67% - this is the highest ever rating
given to a government in Pakistan of corruption.
In a statement today spokesman of the Party said that despite rating as first in
corruption according to Transparency International, the regime was not facing a
single National Accountability Bureau case. This proved that the NAB was for
political and not for corruption purposes.
He said that corruption must be eradicated. Transparency International report
highlights the perception of corruption amongst the citizens. Instead of
politicizing corruption, the task of the Parliament and the people should be to
tackle corruption through setting high moral standards, freedom of information
and an impartial anti corruption watch-dog. The PPP pledged to do this when
voted into government.
The PPP spokesman said that Transparency International findings also rejected
the military regime's view that military dictatorships are honest. It may be
recalled that the military dictatorship supporters and the supporters of
democracy often trade charges as to which government is more corrupt. The
transparency international view, though not
complimentary about political governments, nonetheless comes out against the
military regime as number one in corruption.
He said that when military regimes of Ayub, Yahya, Zia and Musharaf were most
corrupt, creating from twenty two families to a high of sixty seven percent
corruption, it meant that the lower scores showed that the political governments
had improved on the situation although there is still a long way to go.
The spokesman said the issue of corruption should be separated from politics.
The history of Pakistan shows that the corruption prevails because laws are
mocked and political parties broken by abuse of the word while the actual
corruption proliferates.
Go Back
|