Whether Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf can
successfully maintain the emergency rule he imposed last
weekend largely depends on Benazir Bhutto. With her
well-organized, grass-roots Pakistan People's Party
firmly behind her, she is the only opposition political
leader who has the potential clout to stand up to the
four-star army general. But until Wednesday it seemed
unlikely she would challenge him. In light of her return
from exile less than one month ago on the back of a
sweetheart political deal she had struck with the
president, few Pakistanis expected her to jeopardize
that arrangement, which granted her amnesty from a host
of corruption charges, by taking a firm stand. While she
denounced the emergency when it was announced, most
people expected her to meet with the president this week
in the capital in an effort to convince him to soften
his stand.
They were dead wrong. To almost everyone's surprise, and
certainly to Musharraf's, she threw down the gauntlet,
issuing a set of hard-line nonnegotiable demands that
were effectively a declaration of war if he didn't
comply. At a packed press conference at her modest party
headquarters in the capital she gave him until Nov. 15,
the end of his current presidential term, to lift the
emergency, restore the constitution, resign from the
army, release the several thousand people detained so
far, lift the newly imposed media bans, and firmly set
Jan. 15 as the last day to hold free and fair general
elections. Otherwise, she said, she was going to the
streets. Bhutto said she would lead a 220-mile "long
march" from Lahore to Islamabad on Nov. 13 if Musharraf
didn't cave in. For starters, she called for an
antigovernment rally that she would attend this Friday.
"I appeal to the people of Pakistan to come forward,"
she said wearing a white headscarf and a black dress
embroidered with sequins. "We are under attack."
Bhutto said she was making these demands "to save the
country." The danger came largely from Musharraf's
authoritarian ways, she said, adding that she had
negotiated in good faith with Musharraf for a return to
democracy but had been betrayed. "We find ourselves back
in a dictatorship that is breeding extremism," she said.
"The country is endangered by extremism." She charged
that "an organized minority had seized control of the
levers of the state," including officials who had
connections to extremists going way back to the Afghan
mujahedin war against the Soviets, which boosted such
radicals as Osama bin Laden. These unnamed men in the
government and the intelligence agencies, she went on,
were behind the assassination attempt against her last
month, when her motorcade was hit by a huge explosion as
it was traveling through a sea of supporters on the day
she arrived from eight years in exile, killing some
190.
Despite the dangers, she said she was determined to lead
the anti-emergency rally next Friday in the army
garrison city of Rawalpindi, even though the local
authorities have not authorized the demonstration and
even if she risked being arrested or worse. "I
understand my liberty may be at stake," she said, "but
my country is more important." The stakes in
nuclear-armed Pakistan, she added, were much higher.
"Imagine if a nuclear-armed country implodes?" she
asked.
She also pointedly accused the government of not
seriously investigating the assassination attempt
against her. "I know more about what happened in that
bomb blast than they do," she said, referring to the
government. She claimed that her own investigators had
found that the bomb that was aimed at killing her was
not carried by a willing suicide bomber, but was a baby
that had been wired with explosives. Someone in the
crowd was trying to hand the baby onto the truck she was
traveling in when it exploded, she said. The government
counters that a lone suicide bomber, probably from the
lawless tribal area, caused the carnage.
She also appealed to the armed forces that at least
until now have staunchly backed its chief of army staff,
Gen. Musharraf, and his crackdown. She said the unity of
Pakistan was at stake and so was that of the military as
a result of the extremism that his rule had created and
failed to contain in the frontier areas bordering on
Afghanistan where Al Qaeda, the Taliban and Pakistani
tribal militants enjoy a safe haven. Democracy, not more
authoritarianism, was the answer, she said.