Global
Free Trade and South Asia
Address
before the London
Breakfast Club
April
16, 1999

Ladies
and Gentlemen:
I
am honoured to be asked to appear before this distinguished group, and
thank the sponsors and this group of accomplished business executives,
diplomats and Members of Parliament for extending me such warm
hospitality.
As
the world focuses on the atrocities of Kosovo, and makes attempts in
fits and starts to respond as a cohesive global community to the
bloodshed unleashed by the Serbian dictator, it is fitting that, as we
stand on the threshold of a new century, such a diverse group is
gathered in London discussing the future of Asian business, a city so
far away from Asian realities yet becoming closer in trade and
financial ties with each new treaty passage.
I
know that all gathered here today are no strangers to either the
business realities of present Asia, or the explosive growth in global
economic integration we have experienced during this decade.
All
companies -- and countries -- are racing to keep pace with the
revolutionary power that the new technologies of communications and
transportation afford us. We are, in every sense of the word, entering
a century to be dominated by the rules of a global market.
And
as we enter this new and exciting era, this new century, I am
convinced that the new rules of the game are simple and concrete:
In
the 21st Century, nations must uphold the principles of democracy and
the rule of law.
In
the 21st century, governments must guarantee basic freedoms and
liberties to their citizens.
In
the 21st Century, regions must promote free trade with minimal state
intervention, and with a policy of non-intervention and mutual respect
in inter-state relations.
In
the new century, the concerns of the state will be driven more by
considerations of trade and commerce, rather than by our traditional
military - territorial considerations. And the success of a Nation, as
we head towards a new century, shall be based upon its level of
exports, hard currency reserves, its per capita GNP, and the creative
genius of its citizens.
In
our lifetime, achieving near complete free trade worldwide appears
achievable, if not unstoppable.
GLOBAL
FREE TRADE: EU LEADERSHIP
I
came here to comment on trade and South Asia within the larger
international context, and the halting but positive steps that we are
taking to improve the business environment in our vibrant but still
hampered region.
Before
focusing on South Asia, however, let me take a moment to look at the
progress being made worldwide for free trade.
First
and of precedent-setting importance is the example that you, the
European Union, are providing to the rest of humanity. Let us not
mince words: The EU is a revolutionary breakthrough in international
relations, the ramifications of which are not yet fully understood.
Many
around the world have been watching with both astonishment and some
envy as the European nations have been able to create one of the
world's largest single markets in human history, and this without
bloodshed or military conquest. Let us not underestimate the
accomplishment of creating the European Common market by states whose
entire history together has been one of war, animosity and mistrust.
The
desire for the creation of 'super-economic zones' like the EC, was
driven by smaller states seeking to effectively compete economically
with the economic superpowers of the day, namely the United States and
Japan. The GNP of America is (US$ 8 trillion) and of Japan (US$ 5
trillion). Only after combining the 10 'First World' European
economies can the combined EC GNP compete (at US$ 7 trillion).
All
this has been accomplished without a single bullet being fired. Huge
territories, nations and populations peacefully agreed to redefine
their economic borders, and to co-exist with each other in the better
interests of their future well being. The EC's formation is truly a
model case of the new paradigm, where economically we enter an
increasingly 'Borderless World' while maintaining our national
sovereignty. In essence, the EC member states are 'pooling' their
economic sovereignty in creating a free trade zone and a common
currency, thus submerging their narrow national interests for the
greater good of the whole European Community.
THE
RACE FOR GLOBAL FREE TRADE
And,
with the birth of the European Common Market and common currency, we
are now witnessing the unleashing of a global race for ever-larger
free trade blocs and trade zones, and at a pace and scale
unprecedented in human history.
On
two fronts, the European Common Market itself is moving with utmost
speed to expand its model on a global level.
With
the Far East, the EC and the ASEAN nations are in serious discussions
to lower tariffs. This new development, know as ASEM (Asia-Europe
Organization), just concluded its second year of high level
discussions. The fruit bearing trees have been planted.
At
the most recent ASEM meeting in Berlin, EU President German Foreign
Minister Fischer suggested a new Euro-Asia free trade zone, and
through this, creation of "a stable world financial and monetary
system". Asian nations now actively engaged in this process
include Brunei, China, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines,
Singapore, South Korea, Thailand and Vietnam.
In
the opposite direction, the EU, under Spanish leadership, is moving
quickly to establish free trade relationships between the EU and the
South American nations. I understand that a multilateral summit to
move forward this new free trade zone will be held next year, and it
appears that unless the Americans can move at least as fast as the
Europeans, South American trade may move more freely into European
households than into those in America. The irony is not lost that in
one short decade after the ending of the Cold War, American economic
hegemony in its own hemisphere could be so severely challenged.
But
the Europeans are not the only nations moving rapidly to dismantle old
trade barriers. In Africa -- all too often left out of the global
economic debates -- the nations of South and Eastern Africa are
quickly moving to create their own version of the European Common
Market. This new trading bloc, now known as the Common Market for
Eastern and Southern Africa (or COMESA), has set an ambitious but
achievable goal of eliminating tariffs within their bloc by the year
2000. For Africa as a whole, and the 21 nations participating in
COMESA, this is indeed promising news.
In
the Western Hemisphere, while there seems to be a delay in the
expansion of NAFTA, I do not doubt that NAFTA, too, shall expand
throughout the Western Hemisphere. As the largest free trade bloc in
the world, the economics of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico continue to
seek expansion of their model throughout the entire Western
Hemisphere. The new EC competition for South America may urge NAFTA to
heightened urgency.
And
even among the states of the former Soviet Union, high level talks
within the former USSR are gaining momentum for a new free trade zone,
led by the institution of the former Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS). For all of those nations, this is a needed and positive
development, and should be given as much support and encouragement
from the international community as are current IMF rescue packages.
THE
SLOW PATH OF SOUTH ASIA
In
this context of fierce global competition for the creation and
expansion of free trade zones, I turn lastly to South Asia.
South
Asia has been for far too long a region teetering on the edge of
catastrophe.
For
fifty years, we have been at each other’s throats. We have fought
four wars, and the last war dismembered my nation. Our troops, as we
speak, fire at each other in the frozen wasteland called Siachen,
which has become a metaphor for the senselessness that we have allowed
to continue for half a century.
But
there is hope.
Six
weeks ago in Islamabad, I was privileged to participate in the first
Indian-Pakistan All Parliamentarians Conference. This historic meeting
brought together parliamentarians from all parties from both India and
Pakistan.
Over
the course of my lifetime -- a few years less than the conflict
between India and Pakistan -- such a meeting between our two nations
has been unprecedented.
At
that meeting, as our joint political leadership sought common ground
for our regional problems, I unveiled an economic vision for South
Asia.
It
is time for South Asia to fully participate in the explosion of global
trade, and for our respective governments to set-aside territorial
ambitions and seek economic progress for our peoples and our region.
To
the joint delegation, I proposed that the nations of South Asia now
embark on an accelerated path of economic cooperation and follow the
leadership of the European nations.
I
call this the Asian Free Zone. As you may notice, the word 'trade' is
omitted, and for reason, as it is time that we, one fifth of the
world's population, tackle more than trade.
THE
ASIAN FREE ZONE
But
let us first start with trade. Based on our analysis, my
recommendation is that the Asian Free Zone be created in two phases.
In Phase I, the South Asian nations agree to form a free economic zone
along the lines of NAFTA. This zone should comprise first all SAARC
countries, with a secondary but not overly delayed inclusion of Iran,
Turkey and the Muslim nations of the former CIS.
Prior
to coming here, and the disappointing recent SAARC ministers' meeting
in Sri Lanka, I had proposed that a SAARC free trade zone would
require one decade to fully establish. It has been my sense that a
full decade was needed to allow the founding members to reach a
critical phase in their economic development and in their per capita
income.
With
the pace of free trade expansion globally, however, one decade is too
long for this small step for South Asia. We must achieve a free trade
zone among the SAARC nations by 2005, or the peoples of South Asia
will again be left on the sidelines of the global economic engine.
Following
a successful integration of the SAARC economies, Iran, Turkey and the
Muslim CIS states, we propose entering Phase II, including the giant
of China into our regional system, a goal that we must achieve by
2010.
The
states of the 'Asian Free Zone' would be independent sovereign nations
sharing on the pattern of the EC:
(1)
a free economic trade zone
(2)
a common Central Bank with a common trading currency
(3)
a common security policy, and ultimately
(4)
a common revolving Presidency and Parliament (like the EC Presidency
and Parliament).
Even
the smallest member state, such as Sri Lanka through this cooperation
could have a chance to be the President of the 'superpower' Asian
Zone.
In
short, by 2010, I propose a free trade zone encompassing some 3
billion people with a GNP of US$ 7 trillion (based upon 1998
'Purchasing Power Parity').
The
nations included in this new zone by that point could be the SAARC
nations, with Afghanistan, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgystan,
Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, and finally, China.
This
is a vision of an Asian Free Zone, roughly 2/3 of which would be
China, and 1/3 SAARC and Muslim CIS States. Our Asian Free Zone could
then be at the same level, in GNP terms, as the EC, US or Japan.
With
roughly 50% of the World's population located in the Asian Free Zone,
we would have an economic market with considerable weight, influence
and clout in the 21st Century.
FIRST
WITH SAARC
First,
however, our challenge is to solidify the SAARC nations.
The
South Asian region encompassing Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nepal and
Sri Lanka has a common and shared history. We speak the same language.
Our colour is the same. Our thinking, values, pre-47 history and
culture is the same. We have a multi-religious society with Muslims,
Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Parsees, Buddhists, and others.
Each
in our respective countries believes in freedom of religion, in safety
and security resisting outside coercion or intervention. In Dubai,
Singapore, or London, a representative sample of the entire gamut of
our population and religious spectrum has learnt to co-exist
peacefully.
Within
the SAARC nations, we have similar per capita income.
We
are in similar stages of economic development. We all share a common
legal system based on English Law.
We
all have free market-based economies.
We
all share English as a common language for Government and business.
And,
perhaps most importantly, we all share a common history and culture.
NEW
RULES FOR SOUTH ASIA
The
essence of the new paradigm for South Asia is to organize government
and economic affairs in a manner which delivers the maximum progress
to the regional population in the shortest period of time, with the
least wastage in resources.
The
fastest route to economic development and growth for our suffering
people is the generation of critical economic mass through the
formation of larger ' economic free zones'.
Unless
South Asia pulls itself out of the quagmire of poverty, prejudice and
past conflicts, our people will remain slaves within the global
economy, carrying-out menial low paying tasks for the richer citizens
of the First World.
The
choice for us is stark and simple: either continue as warring
sovereign states who continue to carry the "Third World"
label for the next 100 years, or pool our resources to create an Asian
economic powerhouse comparable to the EC.
STEPS
FORWARD
And
to achieve this new era for South Asia, we must make concrete steps on
an urgent basis, or again be left behind:
1.
Cease abusing the trust and confidence of the international rules of
commerce. In Pakistan specifically, there has been perhaps no greater
damage to our economy and our integration into the global economic
system than the senseless and politically motivated attack on the
Independent Power Producers. Foreign investors are rightly outraged,
and many others have been scared off. Pakistan must uphold and value
contracts signed.
2.
Accelerating the current SAFTA talks. We can not wait until 2002 to
create the first small step for lowering tariffs among the SAARC
nations. Let us move these timetables up at least one year.
3.
Entering immediately into free trade discussions with the EC and ASEAN
nations. Free trade among larger trading blocs takes time. Just as the
EC and the Far East have entered a long-term process, so too should
South Asia.
Ladies
and Gentlemen:
I
have already taken too much of your time this morning.
In
closing, I propose to you the notion that if the nations of South Asia
continue to close our borders both among ourselves and towards the
larger global economy, our region risks suffering a similar fate to
that of the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia and other dismembered nations.
If
we are to be partners in the emerging global economy, we must act
swiftly to open our borders, ease our trade restrictions and more
fully integrate with our neighbors.
A
new world is quickly taking shape, one where openness among nations is
the path to survival and progress.
The
people of South Asia cannot afford to wait a full decade for free
trade in our region.
Indeed,
we must be fully open with the world economy within a decade.
This
is my vision for an Asian Free Zone.
I
invite your questions or comments.
Go Back