Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto's
Speech
Abu Dhabi World Leaders Summit
Abu Dhabi, UAE - November 15, 2005

Ladies and
gentlemen,
It is an honor for me to
appear before this unique, truly extraordinary gathering of leaders from all
around the world, converging on the United Arab Emirates as an emerging center
of economic, political and intellectual innovation.
Blessed by resource and
unlimited opportunity, it is significant that it is here in the UAE, where I
have chosen to live and raise my children.
Here I pay tribute to the
late President Shaikh Zayed.
He was a father to his
people, to the larger Arab world and he was also like a father to me.
I shall always remember him
in my heart for allowing me a home away from home, here in the UAE and for his
contributions to Pakistan’s development.
And I will never forget the
warmness of your welcome, the openness of your hospitality and the humanity of
your people.
To all of you, Salaam
Aleichem, May Peace Be With You.
I am asked to share my life
story with you and to speak on leadership.
I am a daughter of the desert
sands of Sindh in Pakistan. It is an ancient land, a land of saints, Sufis and
mystics.
I grew up in the shadow of
Moen Jo Daro, the 5000 year old civilization which once traded with Baghdad and
Bukhara and through them with Europe and the Far East.
My father would tell me
fascinating historical tales of conquest and victory.
I learnt of how the Greek
Conqueror Alexander the Great was bitten by a mosquito in Sindh developing a
fever that killed him in Babylon.
I learnt of how the mighty
can be brought down by the weakest. I learnt that in the greatest adventures one
must never forget the smallest details.
Islam first came to South
Asia through Sindh. An Arab conqueror by the name of Mohammad Bin Qasim landed
on the shores by sea bringing the message of equality that would spread far and
wide in the year 712 A.D.
Some of my family claimed to
have come with Mohammad Bin Qasim and to have settled in Sindh. Others claimed
we were locals who were amongst the first converts to Islam.
There was a great emphasis on
roots and on the values of courage, integrity loyalty, knowledge, honour, duty,
responsibility and pride passed on from generation to generation.
Sindh was largely a tribal
society when I was child. Identity lay in the family, in the tribe, in the soil
and in religion. One’s duty was to uphold the good name of the whole, of which
we as individuals were a part of.
I heard that I was an heir to
the greatness of Islam which proclaimed equality between the rich and the poor,
between the male and female, between the strong and the weak.
I read and re-read how the
powerful conqueror of Sindh Mohammad Bin Qasim was sentenced to death in the
cause of justice. He had failed to protect the dignity of a woman and was
punished losing his life.
It showed me the importance
of the rights of women and it underlined the importance of justice in Islam for
building a truly civilized society. That example, seared into the memory of a
young child, become a part of my life and my struggle.
There was much poverty in
those days in my country. There were few roads, drinking water was scarce,
people were so poor that they were often shirtless and shoeless. Little children
ran naked in the dusty, dirty village lanes with open sewerage gutters. Cow dung
was used for cooking and as fertilizer. It would be scooped up, shaped into
patties and dried on the mud walls of houses.
A midst this squalor and
deprivation, there were a few large families with enormous land holdings and
industrial wealth.
My father told me it was
wrong that so many should be so poor when so few were so rich. He told me that
the Islamic law of inheritance ensured the distribution of wealth rather than
its concentration. He imbibed in me the spirit of social reform and the
principle of social equality—goals that he fought for and which became mine.
I came from a political
family. My grandfather formed the first political party in Sindh and brought out
its first newspaper. He led the movement to separate Muslim Sindh from Hindu
Bombay in the thirties which culminated in the demand for Pakistan in the
forties -- A separate homeland for Muslims of South Asia.
My father was the youngest
Cabinet Minister in South Asia and went on to become its youngest Prime Minister
when he was elected.
I grew up as a pampered child
of privileged family with political and social dominance.
From the young age of 5, I
was under public scrutiny, the daughter of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.
Because of that public
scrutiny, I was taught to always be on guard, on watch, not to make a slip, to
keep my head high, to hide my emotions, to perform my duty, to smile and walk on
because “when you smile, the world smiles with you” and “when you cry, you cry
alone”.
I was shy and led an
insulated life. Except for my cousins and a few close friends, I did not mix
much with other children. We feared that fame brings fair weather friends and
kept to ourselves. We learnt that the price of fame can be loneliness – to avoid
gossip we kept our distance, always protected, shadowed, chaperoned.
Obedience to parents, to
teachers, to God were the hallmarks of my young life.
Moral duty was drilled into
us; “To whom God gives much, much is expected.”
When war between India and
Pakistan broke out in 1965, my mother took me with her to the Red Crescent
Center to help the relief effort.
In 1966, in our ancestral
home in Larkana, when I turned 13, my Mother made me wear a Burqa, the all
enveloping black cloth covering the body from head to toe. As the veil billowed
over my body and covered my eyes, I felt hot, constrained and the world looked
grey through the mists of the veil.
For centuries women in my
family had worn the veil. For centuries women had either married cousins or, if
they were unavailable, remained unmarried. This ensured that the property women
inherited under Islam did not leave the family.
But now my life was to
change. My father was an emancipated man, a reformer who broke the bastions of
tradition and changed the direction of his family, his country and our region.
He took one look at me in the
Burqa as I arrived home and said, “ I don’t want my daughter wearing the veil.”
He told me that Muslims believe that the best veil is the veil in the eyes of a
person.
It was a man, a very special
man, my father, who set me on the road to modernity.
When I turned sixteen, my
father decided to send me abroad for education.
My female relatives opposed
my father’s decision. They begged him to change his mind. The destiny of a young
woman in those days was to make a good marriage, a good home and raise good
children.
Before I left for Harvard, my
father took me to our lands in Larkana.
Here the peasants sweated
under the sun taking care of the fields of wheat and cotton.
My father said, “see how hard
these men work. You must seek knowledge abroad and then return to serve your own
people. Do not be so dazzled by the bright lights as to forget your roots and
the land that gave you birth.”
Then he took me to our family
graveyard where for generations our ancestors lay. “Whenever you go in the
world” he said “this is where you will ultimately return. You are part of this
dust and this dust is part of you.”
As a farewell present, my
father gave me the Holy Book of the Muslims inlaid with precious mother of
Pearl. He hugged me and kissed me. He often joked that I was too argumentative.
His parting words of advice to me were “Don’t argue with Immigration Officers or
taxi drivers.”
And so at 16 I left with my
mother and my Afghan Pashmina coat for Cambridge Massachusetts—to a new world.
For the first time I met
people who did not know who I was, or where my country was.
“Pakistan: where’s that?”
they’d ask.
While I was a student at
Harvard, A separatist movement in present day Bangladesh had torn my country
apart. I refused to believe Pakistani troops could commit genocide in then East
Pakistan. I got into furious arguments with those I found criticizing my
country.
Patriotism burned deep in my
heart.
As a Muslim I was seen as the
spokesperson of the Arab world when discussions about the Middle East arose.
At 17 I addressed the Asia
Society and wrote a letter to Life Magazine defending the Egyptian President
Nasser’s decision to built the Aswan Dam.
As a child of my age, I was
influenced by the social ferment around me. It was a time of student power.
It was a time of war.
American forces were engaged in Vietnam. There was an anti-war movement on
campus. As an Asian at Harvard, I felt strongly about the war in Vietnam.
I joined other students to
protest it.
It was a time of white
minority rule in parts of Africa. The fight against apartheid shaped my
commitment to stand up for the principle of equality between men irrespective of
race or colour.
The women’s movement had
began and with it the debate about women’s role in society.
As a Muslim women I felt
strongly about gender rights. The Prophet of Islam (PBUH) had married a working
woman, a business woman. He had stopped violence against women prohibiting the
burial of the girl child. Islam proclaimed that paradise lay beneath the feet of
the mother and that on the day of judgment we’d be called by our mother’s names.
The movement for women’s
rights empowered and emboldened me.
It was a time when Martin
Luther King defended the rights of the African American and Robert Kennedy spoke
for the underprivileged of America. It was an era of civil rights and morality
where values, rather than force, shaped the destiny of society and of humanity.
These important steps helped
shape my outlook on life, helped me focus on fighting injustice, promoting
freedom, safeguarding the rights of the discriminated and dispossessed.
I was in America during
the impeachment proceedings that brought down it’s President Nixon.
I saw the awesome power of
the people to change policies, to change leaders and to change history.
I marveled at the power of a
people to bring down a government. I lived in a dictatorship. Those criticizing
the President ended up in prison or faced assassination attempts.
From Harvard I went to Oxford
University in London.
Brought up with the Muslim
belief that all people are equal, irrespective of race, religion, colour, caste
or creed, I was shocked to see racism rear its ugly head.
The British Politician Enoch
Powell was threatening to throw all Asians into the sea.
I loved Oxford with its
cobbled streets and college spires. I walked the streets my father had once
walked. I learnt to punt on the river and attend strawberry and cream picnics.
While I was at Oxford the
Conservative Party chose a women, Margaret Thatcher, as leader of the
opposition. The idea of the first female British Prime Minister became an
intense topic of discussion amongst students.
There were many who believed
that the Conservative Party could never win an election because it was led by a
woman.
My father, who had become
Prime Minister by now, thought otherwise.
He invited Mrs. Thatcher to
Pakistan as his guest during the summer, to ensure that I would be there. I
attended his dinner for Mrs. Thatcher. Later Mrs. Thatcher invited me to the
British House of Parliament, the House of Commons the seat of the mother of all
democracies. I was introduced to the world of politics.
My interest in international
affairs was growing but I still did not want to enter politics.
My father would regale me
with stories about Joan of Arc, Mrs. Bandarnaike the world’s first woman Prime
Minister and Mrs. Gandhi of India. Moreover, Mrs. Golda Meir had been Prime
Minister of Israel during the Arab-Israeli war of 1967. All the civilizations of
the world had women Prime Ministers except for the Islamic civilization. Yet it
was Islam which had given the clarion call for gender equality. My father
believed that I was the one who would right the historic balance.
Despite my reluctance, he
clearly saw a political role for me. He groomed me for politics and motivated me
with role models.
I joined the Oxford Union
Students Debating Society because my father wanted me too. Many British Prime
Ministers had started their political careers as Presidents of the Oxford Union.
Even though he did not say it, I felt my father wanted me to run for office
there too. So I did.
At Oxford I was the first
female foreigner to be elected as President of the Oxford Union.
It is said that the Oxford
Union is the training ground for British politics. The entry and exit doors have
“Push” and “Pull” written on them. We joked that politics was all about pushing
and pulling up the greasy ladder of success.
It was there that I first
learnt to debate.
I returned to Pakistan in the
summer of 1977 planning to join the foreign service.
Within a week of my return to
Pakistan, my life changed dramatically.
A military coup took
place. Army tanks had surrounded the Prime Minister’s house. Our life and
family was never to be the same again.
My father was taken away. I
ran to the door as he walked out of the house. I watched the car leave the drive
way taking my father to an unknown destination, with the sun glowing off the
car’s metal plate with the Prime Minister Seal.
As Prime Minister of
Pakistan, I declined to return to live in the Prime Minister's House. It held
too many painful memories for me.
My father was later released
and greeted by hundreds of thousands of people. They swarmed around him pouring
out their love and affection.
This show of popular strength
struck fear into the heart of the military.
Shortly there after I was
woken in the night with armed men barging into my room waving guns and jumping
over the place. They were all over the house. My father was arrested again and
taken away.
He was released, re-arrested,
and finally hanged amidst international outrage at the age of fifty.
I was then half his age. His
Highness President Shaikh Zayed was one of the leading world figures who tried
to save my father’s life and sent my family a condolence message. His support
meant a great deal to us and to the people of Pakistan.
A few hours before my
Father’s murder, my Mother and I went to see him in the squalid death cell where
the military tyrants had kept him. We went to bid him farewell. His courage in
the face of death remains with me.
It was then, in that final
meeting that I decided come what may, I would continue his mission and his work
for a democratic Pakistan with equal rights for all its citizens.
During the long dark night of
military dictatorship, lasting eleven years, my mother and I were repeatedly
arrested, kept apart, in solitarity confinement amidst harsh conditions. Every
attempt was made to break our will but we remained strong bolstered by the love
of the people who supported us.
Our supporters were
whiplashed, tortured, shot and hanged. But they never wavered. Some went to the
gallows with my father’s name on their lips, others were buried with their
coffins covered in the tricoloured party flag.
My mother was baton charged
and denied proper treatment. Today she
suffers from a form of Alzheimer’s her doctors say was brought on by improper
treatment of that head wound.
I spent nearly six years
behind bars, often in solitary confinement. During the summers it was unbearably
hot and during the winters it was brutally cold. The conditions in the cell were
primitive. Mosquitoes, flies, cockroaches, dust storms and dryness were constant
companions as was loneliness and a lack of communication with the outside world.
I spent long hours in
prayer. My belief in God sustained me when each moment seemed an hour, each hour
a day. Through out this period, I was confident that we would triumph, confident
that truth would prevail, confident that those who are patient and persevere are
rewarded with victory. I never lost hope. I never gave up.
I was told that the death
cells were being emptied for me as part of the psychological warfare to break my
spirit. But I held to the belief that life and death are in God’s hands.
By the time I was freed
into exile through international pressure, I was anorexic. My hearing and
eyesight were affected forever. My face muscles hurt when I talked. They had
atrophied through the years of silence. Freed from the grey walls of my prison
cell, I found it hard to adjust to sunlight, to the noise of peoples voices, to
ordinary conversation.
My family background and
long years of imprisonment made me the rallying point for the democratic
movement. I returned to Pakistan in 1986 welcomed by millions of Pakistanis who
demanded an end to dictatorship.
And when I got married and
expected my first child in 1988, the military dictator called for elections. He
thought a pregnant woman could not campaign. I could, and I did, and, with the
support of the brave people of Pakistan, I was elected Prime Minister of
Pakistan.
It was not an easy
campaign. The religious parties that had supported the Afghan Jihad in
Afghanistan opposed me. They claimed that the marriage of any man who voted for
me would be null and void in the eyes of God. They claimed that the only place
for a woman was behind the veil and the four walls of the house—Not in
government.
They said it was a
religious duty to kill me because I was challenging the right of men to rule the
country and defying the tradition enforced on women. But I did not give up. And
won.
Circumstances propelled me
onto the road of leadership.
I find that leadership is
born of a passion and it is a commitment. My commitment to democracy helped me
walk the high mountain of success as well as the low valleys of imprisonment and
exile.
Leadership demands a price
from an individual and it also demands a price from the family.
I do not understand the
work-life balance.
For me, success is 99%
perspiration and one % inspiration.
My election broke the myth
that a woman could not be elected Prime Minister in a Muslim country. It was a
severe set back for the forces of fanaticism that wished to build a theocratic
society.
It stirred a debate in the
entire Muslim world. The lead scholar in Saudi Arabia gave a Fatwa, a religious
edict, against my election. But other religious scholars supported me. I
especially remember the religious scholars in Egypt, Syria and Yemen. The
religious scholar in Yemen said that Islam permitted a woman to govern a Muslim
country. He said the Holy book of the Muslims referred to the rule of Queen
Sheba in laudatory terms noting that her reign brought prosperity to her people.
But the fanatics in
Pakistan were deeply upset at my election. They dreamt of spreading the
ideological frontiers of Islam through Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asia to
the borders of Europe.
Elements of the military
that had fought the Afghan Jihad as a religious war against godless communism
also opposed me. They refused to salute me and engaged in covert conspiracies to
overthrow me.
My opponents turned to Osma
Bin Laden for help. They called him back from Saudi Arabia where he had returned
following the decision of the Soviets to withdraw from Afghanistan in 1989. They
asked him for ten million dollars to bring down the Government I led. In return
they promised to legislate a religious bill turning Pakistan into a theocratic
state.
Until today the fanatics
who believe in a war between the Muslims and the Non-Muslims fear my popularity
and the strength of my Party. They see us as a symbol of a modern Muslim state,
pluralistic, democratic, tolerant, respecting freedom and human rights. They
fear the empowerment of the people which challenges authoritian forms of
government.
Undeterred by the
opposition, my party began the restructuring of the state.
We broke the bureaucratic
stranglehold becoming the first in the region to privatise, deregulate and
decentralize our economy.
We opened up our markets
transforming our economy from permits and permission to initiative and
entrepreneurship.
As Prime Minister of
Pakistan, I successfully built good relations with India through negotiations
with Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.
I bargained with Afghan
leaders to influence the formation of a moderate government in Kabul.
My government opened up
trade and common links with Central Asia.
But the elements of the
military establishment that had fought communism in Afghanistan and now wanted
to take on the west did not give up. They twice destabilized the governments I
led.
During both my stints in
opposition, Pakistan was on the brink of being declared a terrorist state,
during both times, the World Trade Towers were attacked and so were targets in
India, including its Parliament.
It was during the eclipse
of my government in 1996 that the Taliban seized all of Afghanistan. It was
after my overthrow that Al Qaeda was established In Afghanistan and set up camps
to train, recruit and arm young men from across the Muslim world.
Two years after my
overthrow, in 1988, Osama Bin Laden declared war on the west from the soil of
Afghanistan. Three years later, the Trade Centers were attacked.
The cause of history
changed with the change of leadership in Pakistan.
In 2001, the
military regime claimed to change course. Following President Bush’s ultimatum
to stand up and be counted as friend or foe. It said that it had adopted the
policy of peace with India and Afghanistan which I had initiated and internally
tried to restrain armed militias.
However, extremists groups
continue to pose a challenge in Pakistan and in South Asia as the recent New
Delhi bombings demonstrate.
The vendetta against
Bhutto’s daughter, the leader, the military Generals hanged, still continues. I
am forced into exile where I now live.
But I have not given up and
remain the symbol for a democratic future for my country.
I faced many challenges
since 1996. My husband was arrested the night my government was overthrown. He
was held hostage to my political struggle for 8 long years. I am continuously
told that the web of legal cases woven around my family and myself can be broken
if I announce my abdication from political life. I do not do so.
I know that my duty to my
people comes first, for the sake of my children and all the children of
Pakistan. My duty to Pakistan’s democratic struggle is one baptized in blood.
During this struggle, I lost both my brothers who were killed in the prime of
their lives.
I have three children. They
were very small when our troubles started. My youngest was three. I was their
sole caretaker when my husband was in prison for 8 years. I believe women can
combine career and motherhood.
It is critical that women
enter the 21st Century ready to accept the challenges of a modern
world.
The Islamic values of Ijma
and Ijtihad, give us reasoning power to build a consensus for our times.
Acquiescing to tradition --
a tradition of subjugation of mothers and daughters -- can no longer be
accepted.
These are difficult times.
Freedom is under assault. Democracy is under assault. We live in an age of
terrorism.
But we shall prevail if we
reclaim our lives from the fanatics who wish to subjugate women and keep our
people ignorant.
When the human spirit was
immersed in the darkness of the middle ages in Europe, Islam proclaimed equality
between men and women.
Let us remember that Islam
introduced divorce, child custody and alimony for the first time in
civilization. Islam came as a message of emancipation that put an end to the
degradation of women and the burial of the girl child.
It is this tradition of
Islam that allowed me my battle for political and human rights. It strengthens
me today in this hour of crisis for my family, my nation and myself.
As leader of Pakistan, I
ensured the protection of our mothers, sisters and daughters.
The cause of women rights
is for me a cause of human rights.
The new century must, for
once and for all, exclude the notion of battered women.
It must be an era where
honor and dignity are protected in peace, and in war, where women have economic
freedom and independence, where women are not defined by their fathers or
husbands, but by their own achievements, where they are equal partners in peace
and development.
My time in exile has
coincided with the era of terrorism and the threat of a clash of cultures, of a
miscommunication between the Islamic and Non-Islamic world.
I tried to act as a bridge
between different cultures, countries and continents.
I explained the peaceful
and tolerant message of Islam to international audiences to correct the
misperceptions propagated by the extremists who exploit it to promote their
politics of hate.
I visited India to promote
a South Asia where there is peace and prosperity through open borders and trade.
My political opponents have now accepted the wisdom of the policies for which I
was once termed a “security risk.”
When I was at Oxford, I won
the Presidency of the Oxford Union debating that “The Pen is more powerful than
the Sword.”
I believe in the battle of
ideas, and that no force can win a victory against an idea, a policy or a vision
that is based on truth and justice.
I still believe the Pen is
more Powerful than the Sword although the world has changed since I was a
student at Oxford.
The era of peace for which
we prayed has become a time for war.
Tolerance has been replaced
with terrorism.
There was a time when
multi-lateral leadership succeeded in those glorious days when the Berlin Wall
fell and freedom swept the Eastern Bloc at the end of the last century.
The peace bonus, when we
hoped that poverty would be eliminated by diverting resources used to fight the
Cold War, did not materialise.
The stability we hoped to
achieve in a unipolar world has degenerated into dangerous unpredictability.
The attack on the World Trade
Towers created a new form of unilateral leadership. Now fear replaces hope.
Unilateralism in Iraq has
lead to hundreds of thousands Iraqi deaths, 2000 American deaths, and a U.S.
national debt of 300 billion dollars.
Natural disasters in the
world are fueling economic and political instability. The Tsunami killed a
quarter of a million people in December 2004. A devastating earthquake in
Northern Pakistan and Kashmir killed 100,000 of my fellow countrymen, rendering
millions homeless through a cold and dangerous winter.
The hurricane Katrina created
the unsettling image of an American city underwater with a superpower unable to
quickly save its own people.
Ladies and gentlemen,
The natural disasters take
place against a reconfiguration of the international economy and international
wealth.
Many of us believe that
demography is destiny, that demographic factors shape economic factors,
political factors, and the military balance of power.
The moving finger of
demography writes, and having written, moves on. The demographic hand is writing
in this very continent of Asia where many predict that the 21rst century could
be the Chinese century.
New York
has 2000 skyscrapers rising from the rock of Manhattan. Yet Shanghai has an
astanding 4000 skyscrapers -- twice as many as New York.
The American debt was bought,
principally by Japan and China. The financial institutions of the East now
underwrite the 200 billion dollars borrowed to rebuild America’s Gulf Coast.
The energy situation is another example.
In 1977, U.S. President Jimmy
Carter was ridiculed for declaring that the energy crisis was the “moral
equivalent of war.”
China and India are emerging
as two new powers as thirsty for energy consumption as the west.
Increased competition for
diminishing energy reserves will force the price of energy in only one direction
-- UP. This can further disrupt the economics, politics and social stability of
the 21st century.
Ladies and gentlemen,
It is impossible to separate
economic justice from political liberty.
I can attest to the price to
world peace paid when human rights is not integral to the foreign policy goals
of the major democratic players in international affairs.
We learn that, democracy,
women’s rights, human rights, press freedom are important, but apparently
only sometimes.
Violations of these
principles lead to international sanctions -- but only sometimes.
Some believe that the
imposition of democracy on Iraq would somehow democratize this entire region.
But critics claim that an artificial confederation drawn under occupation will
remain controversial and short-lived.
I recall that Communism was
not defeated by capitalism or by the NATO; it was fundamentally defeated by
humanism. The Czech President Vaclav Havel so accurately noted that “communism
was not defeated by military force, but by the human spirit, by conscience, by
the resistance of man to manipulation.
This is manifest in the
large, discontented, and radicalizing Muslim communities in France and across
much of Europe. The challenge is to transform alienated Muslim immigrants and
their children into integrated members of the nation, convincing them to accept
the full obligations of democratic citizenship.
This can not be accomplished
through economic subjugation and social ostracism. The way forward is not
religious and cultural ridicule. The way forward is through equality,
opportunity and respect for cultural and religious pluralism. It is through
religious tolerance.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Islam denounces inequality as
the greatest form of injustice.
It enjoins its followers to
combat oppression and tyranny.
It enshrines piety as the
sole criteria for judging humankind.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Despite the constraints of a
political system that was all too often rigged against democrats, and a social
system that was biased against women, when I became prime Minister of Pakistan I
used my office to try to reverse centuries of discrimination.
My tenure was a textbook
affirmative action program against gender discrimination. We increased literacy
by one-third, even more dramatically among girls.
We brought down the
population growth rate by establishing women’s health clinics in thousands of
communities across our Nation.
We outlawed domestic violence
and established special women’s police forces to protect and defend the women of
Pakistan.
We appointed women judges to
our nation’s benches for the first time in our history.
We instituted a new program
of hiring women police officers to investigate crimes of domestic violence
against the women of Pakistan.
We encouraged women’s and
girl’s participation in sports, both nationally and internationally by lifting
the ban imposed on their participation.
We held a Muslim Women’s
Olympics.
We held the first meeting of
a Muslim Women’s Parliamentary Conference.
The record I accomplished is
one in which I have great pride. Despite the reversals in my homeland -- the
progress that we made raised the bar of expectations and cannot long be ignored.
In my commitment to political
liberty and to democracy, I have never wavered.
Unfortunately, that has not
always been the case in the conduct by many great nations of international
affairs over the last generation.
Afghanistan is an example of
how retreating from the principles of human rights and democracy can have the
most tragic consequences.
The overall policy of
standing against Soviet aggression in Afghanistan was right. Yet in our
admirable zeal to end the Soviet occupation, we did not plan our work for a
post-war Afghanistan built on democratic and Islamic principles of coalition,
consensus and cooperation.
We were not consistently
committed to the values of freedom, democracy, social equality and
self-determination that ultimately undermine the basic tenets of terrorism.
We must not make that mistake
again.
There must be a middle ground
between the internationalist realism theory of the late Hans Morgenthau,
constructing power devoid of moral content, and the interventionist
internationalism of the neoconservative movements that ignore cultural
diversity.
Might doesn’t always or
necessarily make right. Indeed it was the American President Abraham Lincoln
who said that it is “right that makes might.”
This mix of realism and
idealism was best manifest when The United States, under President Bill Clinton,
militarily intervened to stop the genocide of Muslims in the former Yugoslavia.
Was the US strategically
threatened? No.
Was it morally threatened by
genocide on this planet? Yes.
It should be a guide for the
international community on what can be done, what must be done, to successfully
confront clear and unambiguous evil.
Ladies and gentlemen,
It is clear to me, that the
solution to the paradoxes of the early 21st century can only be
achieved by broad consensus. Solutions will not be imposed by political
extremes, whether on the left or the right.
The Right would seek to
intervene to impose their values and their policies across society.
The Left can take on the aura
of elitism and are at times contemptuous of the broad cross section of people in
the middle of society who are religious, honest and hardworking, and want
nothing more than a secure and decent life for their children.
In so many places on this
planet the debate rages between the extremes -- those on the margins of society
who have contempt for each other, and for anyone else -- who does not endorse
their political agenda.
This is the tragedy of
politics throughout the world.
There is a Center, a Sensible
Center, a Moderate Center, which is outside the political decision
making process.
Ladies and gentlemen,
The Sensible Center may be
ignored, but in the end it is the Sensible Center that is the answer.
When political forces,
political parties and political leaders can finally come to realize and fully
appreciate that they have a fundamental obligation to society, the world can
gallop into the unlimited social, educational, global and scientific promise of
the 21st century.
It is our job to find
answers.
It is our job to find
consensus.
It is our job to marginalize
the extremes.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Robert F. Kennedy once said
that “the future does not belong to those who are content with today…… Rather it
will belong to those who can blend vision, reason and courage in a personal
commitment to the ideals and great enterprises of society.”
Vision, Reason and Courage.
Those are the true qualities
of leadership.
Thank you, ladies and
gentlemen.