Manifestos  ::  Contact Us  ::  Home     

 
 

Why Quaid's Pakistan Faces Demise?
By Wajid Shamsul Hassan - November 30, 2006

 

"Quaid’s Pakistan faces a definite demise… " This is also not a quote from any of the scholarly pieces by Selig Harrison or Stephen Cohen or for that matter, those think tanks that have either written off Pakistan as a failed or a failing state treading merrily on the suicidal path to erstwhile Yugoslavia’s fate. Most certainly not!  

 

This is just a sentence from our own devil incarnate, the General who gave a new lease of political life to the extremist breed of mullahs by resuscitating them to a size larger than they could ever imagine in Mr Jinnah’s Pakistan. Remember his accusation in the United States with reference to Mukhtaran Mai’s case that it has become a fashion in Pakistan among women to get themselves raped in order to get a foreign visa to settle abroad. Now the same man   having delayed it for seven years at the cost of hundreds of rapes of innocent women—has managed to win a sort of international award for his services for the protection of female specie in Pakistan. 

 

Past master in game of deception, this megalomaniac character   is now busy repainting his Praetorian image with a brush that would make him look like a modern, progressive and liberal democrat on an election trail to save what he calls Quaid’s Pakistan confronted by a definite demise. His slogan for “mother of all elections”—a close contest between the moderates and the extremists to be held some time in 2007-- is a passionate appeal to the electorate to vote for the “moderate and enlightened” candidates to stem the rising tide of extremism threatening Pakistan with extinction.  

 

According to some political analysts, this obviously means his own election a third time as the President in uniform and election of those persons green-pencilled by him and his intelligence apparatus as candidates. A source in the PML-Q revealed to me that in his recent closed door meetings with the key figures in the party he had just one assignment for them—get him two-third majority. He also assured them that his entire administrative set up including the intelligence agencies—would be at their service to make their task of winning two-third majority easier. He also allayed their fears of new political alignments and assured them “we will sink and swim together”. Those who know him well and the commando that he is, they believe that he would do what he was taught in the SSG as the basic instinct—if there is a trap situation—run if you can, there is always another day tomorrow.    

 

His desire for the election of “enlightened and moderates” is much similar to Zia’s concept of “positive results” (musbat nataiaj). Newer methods of pre-polls rigging have been set in motion, the contract to supply thousands of computers that could churn out results according to the data prepared before hand has been given to the close confidantes of the Gujrati thugs deeply in cahoots with the General to carry out “mother of all riggings” in Musharraf’s “mother-of-all elections”.   

 

Notwithstanding Shaheen Sehbai’s forecast of a more favourable climate for former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto in the months ahead, my submission here is based on independent sources active on ground in Pakistan. For them—like Ms Bhutto—change of far-reaching socio-economic and political consequences can only come about when people through free, fair and transparent elections exercise their vote and establish themselves as the sole arbiters of power. There is no short cut to it—even via Washington route.  

 

When Pakistan’s military establishment started exercising the take over of the country from the civilian leaders of the pre-partition breed, they came up with their idea of the so-called Nazaria-i-Pakistan—an ideology contrary to the liberal vision of Mr Jinnah, gave it a religious mould and incorporated in it as its crusaders the bearded Mullahs rejected by the Muslim electorate in the pre-partitioned sub-continent in their preference to a westernized, London-educated, cigar/cigarette smoking and wine drinking Mr Jinnah.  

 

Right from the days of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan who too was declared a “kafir” by the religious right, Islam was never an issue. Muslims in India had freedom to pray, had their own personal laws and they were equal citizens with the Hindus in the religious sense. It was in the political and more so economic sense that they were deprived communities. Whether it was Syed Ahmed Khan, Allama Muhammad Iqbal or Mr Jinnah—the main objective before them was the renaissance of Muslims as a socio-politico-economic force. 

 

Mr Jinnah minced no words in declaring : 

 

  • That he would not have a Pakistan in which man would not exploit man (it did not exclude women); in which poor will become poorer and rich richer;

  • That in his Pakistan religion shall not have anything to do with the business of the state, that is, it shall not be a theocratic state.

  • That in his Pakistan all its citizens shall be equal irrespective of their caste, creed or colour. They shall cease to be Muslims, Christians, Hindus etc., in the political sense and as equal citizens, they shall be free to go to their mosques, temples and churches etc.

  • That in his Pakistan there shall be equality of opportunity, that it shall be an egalitarian state based on the socio-economic justice of Islam and Islamic socialism.

  • That in his Pakistan sovereignty shall belong to the people, that its armed forces and civil servants shall remain subservient to the commands of an elected government;

  • That the right to change the government shall remain with the people.

Pakistan today is definitely under threat of an imminent demise as the General puts it. He does not say that it has come to this stage because its military establishment gave the religious cover to the secular ideology of Mr Jinnah’s Pakistan and exploited the so-called Nazaria-i-Pakistan to perpetuate itself in power through Mullah-Military alliance to waylay Pakistan’s march onto the road to secular democracy. The greatest disservice that the military establishment has done to Pakistan—for me it is worst than its shameless surrender to India in 1971 at Dhaka—was to distort Pakistan’s secular and liberal ideology and replace it with the Nazaria-e-Pakistan.   

 

This deliberate ideological distortion has fractured the unity among the people, deprived Pakistan of its avowed secular raison d’etre and converted Pakistan into an epicentre of global Jihadi terrorism. The military burial of its Jinnahite secular raison d’etre has brought Pakistan to the point in many capitals of the world where geo-strategic decisions are taken to the conclusion that since Pakistan-- as projected by its military establishment and Mullahs—is a religious state based on Islam as its ideology—will have to be written off in order to save the world from Jihadi terrorism paving ground for a Third World War. 

 

Notwithstanding his call for “mother-of-all elections” and the misconstrued euphoria about the truncated Women’s Protection Bill, the conclusive fact is that such half-hearted measures cannot save Pakistani women from becoming a victim in the prevailing culture of rape or for that matter “mother-of-all elections” can avoid Pakistan’s inevitable demise. The medicine needed to cure the patient is going back to Pakistan’s secular ideology, a quiet burial to the so-called Nazaria-business, total disengagement of the military from politics, dismantling the political role of the intelligence agencies, free, fair and transparent election, genuine transfer of power to the elected representatives of the people and establishment of the rule of law. Merely rhetorical show of concern on the threat of demise of the country or calling the 2007 polls “mother-of-all elections” are nothing but empty vessels making the meaningless noise. (Pakistan Weekly Nov 30, 2006)

 

Go Back

 

  Copyright 2007, All Rights Reserved  -----  Webmaster PPP

Privacy Policy & Disclaimer